As the 2024 presidential election approaches, the stakes are perceived as significant in the race between Vice President Kamala Harris and Former President Donald Trump. Scholars from the University of Chicago have shared their insights on several critical issues that are influencing voters' decisions.
Associate Professor Marshini Chetty highlights the challenges posed by misinformation and cybersecurity. "Misinformation about the candidates is only going to increase as we head towards Election Day," she notes, advising voters to verify information through multiple trusted sources. Chetty emphasizes that misinformation and security threats can impact voters' ability to make informed decisions.
On immigration, Associate Professor Angela Garcia points out that undocumented immigration remains a top concern for voters. She observes that since 1986, no comprehensive immigration reform has been successfully enacted, leading to a militarized U.S.-Mexico border and limited legal entry channels. Garcia stresses the importance of evaluating candidates' immigration policies given this congressional inaction.
Professor Geoffrey R. Stone discusses reproductive rights, warning of potential federal restrictions if Republicans gain control of all three branches of government. He states, "The risk of serious federal restrictions on abortion rights is quite real," noting that similar legislation could affect rights for gay and transgender individuals.
Professor Steven Durlauf addresses economic concerns, stating that differences between Harris and Trump extend beyond typical policy disagreements. He warns that Trump's proposed tariffs could lead to price increases and retaliatory actions globally. Durlauf underscores that beliefs about future stability significantly influence economic conditions.
Finally, Associate Professor Paul Poast examines foreign policy perspectives among voters. While many may not prioritize foreign policy in their voting decisions, disillusionment with U.S. actions in global conflicts like Gaza might deter some from voting altogether. Poast contrasts Harris's traditional view of U.S. global leadership with Trump's more personalized approach to international negotiations.
The insights provided by these scholars reflect diverse perspectives on key issues shaping voter priorities in this pivotal election year.